Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Petitioner challenged SCN alleging conspiracy to issue fake invoices without actual supply using another entity's GST registration for tax evasion. HC held petitioner has remedy to file objection for adjudication on merits. Mere assertion of lack of jurisdiction or abuse of process insufficient for invoking Article 226. When factual adjudication required, Article 226 interference ruled out as held in UOI v. Vicco Labs. Petitioner's reasons agitable before adjudicating authority itself. No grounds to entertain petition under Article 226. Petitioner relegated to pursue statutory remedies. Petition dismissed.
Petitioner challenged SCN alleging conspiracy to issue fake invoices without actual supply using another entity's GST registration for tax evasion. HC held petitioner has remedy to file objection for adjudication on merits. Mere assertion of lack of jurisdiction or abuse of process insufficient for invoking Article 226. When factual adjudication required, Article 226 interference ruled out as held in UOI v. Vicco Labs. Petitioner's reasons agitable before adjudicating authority itself. No grounds to entertain petition under Article 226. Petitioner relegated to pursue statutory remedies. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
