Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT condoned the 1 day delay in filing the appeal, holding that as per Rule 22 of NCLAT Rules, 2016 and its orders, the date of e-filing has to be treated as the date for calculating limitation. Regarding replacement of the Authorized Representative of homebuyers, the NCLAT held that Regulation 16A(3A) of CIRP Regulations has to be followed, and the Adjudicating Authority rightly relied on it. The appeal was dismissed as no case was made out to interfere with the impugned order.
The NCLAT condoned the 1 day delay in filing the appeal, holding that as per Rule 22 of NCLAT Rules, 2016 and its orders, the date of e-filing has to be treated as the date for calculating limitation. Regarding replacement of the Authorized Representative of homebuyers, the NCLAT held that Regulation 16A(3A) of CIRP Regulations has to be followed, and the Adjudicating Authority rightly relied on it. The appeal was dismissed as no case was made out to interfere with the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.