Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellant supplied cranes to Municipal Corporation Bhopal (MCB) under an agreement. CESTAT held appellant did not have effective control or possession over cranes during contract period with MCB. Cranes were parked at police stations, drivers were paid by MCB. Appellant could not use cranes for any other purpose. CESTAT ruled activity was 'giving cranes on hire' not 'supply of tangible goods service'. Demand wrongly confirmed, appeal allowed.
Appellant supplied cranes to Municipal Corporation Bhopal (MCB) under an agreement. CESTAT held appellant did not have effective control or possession over cranes during contract period with MCB. Cranes were parked at police stations, drivers were paid by MCB. Appellant could not use cranes for any other purpose. CESTAT ruled activity was 'giving cranes on hire' not 'supply of tangible goods service'. Demand wrongly confirmed, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.