Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
An EOU (100% Export Oriented Unit) is entitled to take suo-moto re-credit of the CENVAT credit earlier reversed, without following the refund procedure u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. When the original credit was eligible, and the reversal was merely an accounting entry, suo-moto re-credit is permissible. The extended period of limitation cannot be invoked without evidence of willful misstatement or suppression. Consequently, the demand of Rs.40,64,459/- u/r 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, interest, and penalties were held untenable by the CESTAT. The appeal was allowed.
An EOU (100% Export Oriented Unit) is entitled to take suo-moto re-credit of the CENVAT credit earlier reversed, without following the refund procedure u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. When the original credit was eligible, and the reversal was merely an accounting entry, suo-moto re-credit is permissible. The extended period of limitation cannot be invoked without evidence of willful misstatement or suppression. Consequently, the demand of Rs.40,64,459/- u/r 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, interest, and penalties were held untenable by the CESTAT. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
