Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Petitioner, a central public sector undertaking, challenged rejection of its appeal by appellate authority solely on grounds of delay without considering merits. HC quashed appellate order as perverse for mechanically dismissing condonation application without adequately considering petitioner's lack of knowledge about impugned order's issuance. Relying on precedent, HC condoned delay, exercising power u/s 107(4) of the Act, rendering remand to appellate authority unnecessary. Petition disposed of.
Petitioner, a central public sector undertaking, challenged rejection of its appeal by appellate authority solely on grounds of delay without considering merits. HC quashed appellate order as perverse for mechanically dismissing condonation application without adequately considering petitioner's lack of knowledge about impugned order's issuance. Relying on precedent, HC condoned delay, exercising power u/s 107(4) of the Act, rendering remand to appellate authority unnecessary. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
