Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The HC held that the appellant's case has to be accepted and necessary rectification has to be done. Due to discrepancies in data migration from the Legacy ACES Application to the new Integrated ACES-GST Application, the appellant's tax liabilities were affected as PART B of the revised return was not duly populated. The impugned order was set aside with a direction to the authorities to make the necessary correction in the Portal and issue a revised order accepting the appellant's stand. The appeal was allowed.
The HC held that the appellant's case has to be accepted and necessary rectification has to be done. Due to discrepancies in data migration from the Legacy ACES Application to the new Integrated ACES-GST Application, the appellant's tax liabilities were affected as PART B of the revised return was not duly populated. The impugned order was set aside with a direction to the authorities to make the necessary correction in the Portal and issue a revised order accepting the appellant's stand. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
