Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order recalling the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor u/s 65 of the IBC. It found that the Section 7 application was filed fraudulently and with malicious intent by the Appellants for purposes other than insolvency resolution. The Appellants, despite being ineligible, had advanced alleged loans violating Section 186 of the Companies Act, creating a contrived situation of debt and default through collusion with the Corporate Debtor's promoters. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding the findings of fraudulent CIRP initiation were justified based on the totality of circumstances.
The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order recalling the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor u/s 65 of the IBC. It found that the Section 7 application was filed fraudulently and with malicious intent by the Appellants for purposes other than insolvency resolution. The Appellants, despite being ineligible, had advanced alleged loans violating Section 186 of the Companies Act, creating a contrived situation of debt and default through collusion with the Corporate Debtor's promoters. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding the findings of fraudulent CIRP initiation were justified based on the totality of circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
