Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC set aside the non-speaking order of the respondent and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration of the demand in the show cause notice and the petitioner's reply. The respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reconciliation report which showed excess credit of Rs. 1,40,684/- after adjusting IGST, CGST and SGST, violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's explanation. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC set aside the non-speaking order of the respondent and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration of the demand in the show cause notice and the petitioner's reply. The respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reconciliation report which showed excess credit of Rs. 1,40,684/- after adjusting IGST, CGST and SGST, violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's explanation. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.