Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The HC set aside the non-speaking order of the respondent and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration of the demand in the show cause notice and the petitioner's reply. The respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reconciliation report which showed excess credit of Rs. 1,40,684/- after adjusting IGST, CGST and SGST, violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's explanation. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC set aside the non-speaking order of the respondent and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration of the demand in the show cause notice and the petitioner's reply. The respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reconciliation report which showed excess credit of Rs. 1,40,684/- after adjusting IGST, CGST and SGST, violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's explanation. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.