Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
The HC set aside the non-speaking order of the respondent and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration of the demand in the show cause notice and the petitioner's reply. The respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reconciliation report which showed excess credit of Rs. 1,40,684/- after adjusting IGST, CGST and SGST, violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's explanation. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC set aside the non-speaking order of the respondent and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration of the demand in the show cause notice and the petitioner's reply. The respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reconciliation report which showed excess credit of Rs. 1,40,684/- after adjusting IGST, CGST and SGST, violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's explanation. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.