Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC held that while writ petitions under Article 226 are ordinarily not maintainable if statutory remedy is available, exceptions exist for violation of natural justice principles. Failure to grant personal hearing to the petitioner before cancellation of CGST registration violated Section 75(4) of the GST Act and natural justice. Consequently, the impugned order cancelling petitioner's registration was set aside by the HC.
The HC held that while writ petitions under Article 226 are ordinarily not maintainable if statutory remedy is available, exceptions exist for violation of natural justice principles. Failure to grant personal hearing to the petitioner before cancellation of CGST registration violated Section 75(4) of the GST Act and natural justice. Consequently, the impugned order cancelling petitioner's registration was set aside by the HC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.