Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and held that no penalty u/s 270A could be levied for non-payment of service tax liability and employees' contribution to PF before the due date. It was an admitted fact that both amounts were already available in the audit report, which formed the basis for disallowance by the AO. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in Prem Brothers Infrastructure LLP, it cannot be considered mis-reporting. The Supreme Court in Price Waterhouse Coopers (P.) Ltd. held that no penalty could be imposed for a mistake disclosed in the tax audit report. Since no adjustment was made in the intimation u/s 143(1), it was not a fit case for levying penalty u/s 270A.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and held that no penalty u/s 270A could be levied for non-payment of service tax liability and employees' contribution to PF before the due date. It was an admitted fact that both amounts were already available in the audit report, which formed the basis for disallowance by the AO. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in Prem Brothers Infrastructure LLP, it cannot be considered mis-reporting. The Supreme Court in Price Waterhouse Coopers (P.) Ltd. held that no penalty could be imposed for a mistake disclosed in the tax audit report. Since no adjustment was made in the intimation u/s 143(1), it was not a fit case for levying penalty u/s 270A.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.