Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The appellant, an EOU/EHTP unit, is eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-Cus at the time of debonding of imported goods. The customs duty should be calculated at the effective rate applicable at the time of debonding. The appellant's procedural compliance by furnishing a bond of Rs. 1000 crores is sufficient for claiming the exemption. The exemption can be claimed at debonding, even if not availed at the time of importation. The demand for duty and interest raised in the impugned order is not justified. The CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant is entitled to the exemption benefit under Notification No. 12/2012-Cus at debonding.
The appellant, an EOU/EHTP unit, is eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-Cus at the time of debonding of imported goods. The customs duty should be calculated at the effective rate applicable at the time of debonding. The appellant's procedural compliance by furnishing a bond of Rs. 1000 crores is sufficient for claiming the exemption. The exemption can be claimed at debonding, even if not availed at the time of importation. The demand for duty and interest raised in the impugned order is not justified. The CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant is entitled to the exemption benefit under Notification No. 12/2012-Cus at debonding.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
