Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC set aside the order dismissing the petitioner's application u/s 91 CrPC. It directed SEBI to produce all documents considered by HPAC and WTM while rejecting the petitioner's request for compounding the alleged offense, though in a sealed cover. Regulation 29 of the Settlement Regulation cannot prohibit the court from examining these materials to decide on allowing or rejecting compounding as per Supreme Court guidelines in Prakash Gupta case. The decision on supplying these documents to the petitioner rests with the court.
The HC set aside the order dismissing the petitioner's application u/s 91 CrPC. It directed SEBI to produce all documents considered by HPAC and WTM while rejecting the petitioner's request for compounding the alleged offense, though in a sealed cover. Regulation 29 of the Settlement Regulation cannot prohibit the court from examining these materials to decide on allowing or rejecting compounding as per Supreme Court guidelines in Prakash Gupta case. The decision on supplying these documents to the petitioner rests with the court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.