Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the review applications filed for waiver of pre-deposit of penalties under FERA. The appellants' failure to comply with the deposit order justified the dismissal of their appeals. The AT found the review petitions failed to meet the conditions under CPC and did not fall within the principles culled out in the Kamal Sengupta judgment after unfavorable orders from higher courts. As held in Ram Kishor Gupta judgment, there was no question of filing reviews of the order affirmed by higher judicial fora. The AT concluded the review petitions had no merit and were dismissed.
The AT dismissed the review applications filed for waiver of pre-deposit of penalties under FERA. The appellants' failure to comply with the deposit order justified the dismissal of their appeals. The AT found the review petitions failed to meet the conditions under CPC and did not fall within the principles culled out in the Kamal Sengupta judgment after unfavorable orders from higher courts. As held in Ram Kishor Gupta judgment, there was no question of filing reviews of the order affirmed by higher judicial fora. The AT concluded the review petitions had no merit and were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.