Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Appellant applied for rebate of Central Excise Duty by producing fake shipping bills, fraudulently availing rebate. Settlement Commission order stated no immunity granted under FEMA. Findings conclusive - remittances received without actual exports, documents bore appellant's signatures, export proceeds realized by appellant without written arrangement. Delay irrelevant as FEMA violations civil in nature. Appellant responsible as proprietor to ensure export realization. Contravened FEMA by not making shipments within one year of receiving advance remittances. Penalty imposable despite lack of mens rea. Mitigating factors - appeared all documentation completed, later known documents forged, full disclosure to Settlement Commission, paid liabilities. No evidence of active collusion in forgery. Penalty reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs by AT.
Appellant applied for rebate of Central Excise Duty by producing fake shipping bills, fraudulently availing rebate. Settlement Commission order stated no immunity granted under FEMA. Findings conclusive - remittances received without actual exports, documents bore appellant's signatures, export proceeds realized by appellant without written arrangement. Delay irrelevant as FEMA violations civil in nature. Appellant responsible as proprietor to ensure export realization. Contravened FEMA by not making shipments within one year of receiving advance remittances. Penalty imposable despite lack of mens rea. Mitigating factors - appeared all documentation completed, later known documents forged, full disclosure to Settlement Commission, paid liabilities. No evidence of active collusion in forgery. Penalty reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs by AT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.