Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Procedural irregularities without fraudulent intent do not warrant harsh penalties u/s 129 of GST enactments. HC quashed impugned order due to procedural nature of irregularities and absence of fraudulent intent. Petitioner's failure to register additional place of business and generation of E-way bill and invoices after detention considered technical and venial breach. Unless variance between invoice, E-way bill quantities and actual seizure, penalty u/s 129(3) of CGST Act harsh under facts.
Procedural irregularities without fraudulent intent do not warrant harsh penalties u/s 129 of GST enactments. HC quashed impugned order due to procedural nature of irregularities and absence of fraudulent intent. Petitioner's failure to register additional place of business and generation of E-way bill and invoices after detention considered technical and venial breach. Unless variance between invoice, E-way bill quantities and actual seizure, penalty u/s 129(3) of CGST Act harsh under facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
