Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Procedural irregularities without fraudulent intent do not warrant harsh penalties u/s 129 of GST enactments. HC quashed impugned order due to procedural nature of irregularities and absence of fraudulent intent. Petitioner's failure to register additional place of business and generation of E-way bill and invoices after detention considered technical and venial breach. Unless variance between invoice, E-way bill quantities and actual seizure, penalty u/s 129(3) of CGST Act harsh under facts.
Procedural irregularities without fraudulent intent do not warrant harsh penalties u/s 129 of GST enactments. HC quashed impugned order due to procedural nature of irregularities and absence of fraudulent intent. Petitioner's failure to register additional place of business and generation of E-way bill and invoices after detention considered technical and venial breach. Unless variance between invoice, E-way bill quantities and actual seizure, penalty u/s 129(3) of CGST Act harsh under facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
