Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT allowed the approval of the New Board's decision to collapse/unwind transactions whereby IFIN provided loans to third parties, except for certain respondents (8-12). The NCLAT set aside the IRP's rejection of IFIN's claim in the CIRP of Attivo Economic Zone (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd., restoring IFIN's status. The NCLAT held that collapsing agreements with respondents 8-12 required deeper consideration as SIFL claimed the amounts were given by SIFL, not third-party borrowers. The appropriate forum to examine these transactions is the pending NCLT proceedings.
The NCLAT allowed the approval of the New Board's decision to collapse/unwind transactions whereby IFIN provided loans to third parties, except for certain respondents (8-12). The NCLAT set aside the IRP's rejection of IFIN's claim in the CIRP of Attivo Economic Zone (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd., restoring IFIN's status. The NCLAT held that collapsing agreements with respondents 8-12 required deeper consideration as SIFL claimed the amounts were given by SIFL, not third-party borrowers. The appropriate forum to examine these transactions is the pending NCLT proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.