Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT allowed the approval of the New Board's decision to collapse/unwind transactions whereby IFIN provided loans to third parties, except for certain respondents (8-12). The NCLAT set aside the IRP's rejection of IFIN's claim in the CIRP of Attivo Economic Zone (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd., restoring IFIN's status. The NCLAT held that collapsing agreements with respondents 8-12 required deeper consideration as SIFL claimed the amounts were given by SIFL, not third-party borrowers. The appropriate forum to examine these transactions is the pending NCLT proceedings.
The NCLAT allowed the approval of the New Board's decision to collapse/unwind transactions whereby IFIN provided loans to third parties, except for certain respondents (8-12). The NCLAT set aside the IRP's rejection of IFIN's claim in the CIRP of Attivo Economic Zone (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd., restoring IFIN's status. The NCLAT held that collapsing agreements with respondents 8-12 required deeper consideration as SIFL claimed the amounts were given by SIFL, not third-party borrowers. The appropriate forum to examine these transactions is the pending NCLT proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.