Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The HC held that the GST amount paid on an advance for a contract that was later rescinded due to non-performance by the supplier must be refunded. The levy of tax is on the transaction; if the transaction fails, what is paid in advance needs to be refunded. The HC directed the appellant to refund the GST amount to the respondent-assessee within eight weeks. The appeal was dismissed.
The HC held that the GST amount paid on an advance for a contract that was later rescinded due to non-performance by the supplier must be refunded. The levy of tax is on the transaction; if the transaction fails, what is paid in advance needs to be refunded. The HC directed the appellant to refund the GST amount to the respondent-assessee within eight weeks. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
