Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CIT(A) directed to first adjudicate assessee's appeal against quantum assessment, determine business turnover, and whether assessee falls within Section 44AB for audit obligation before adjudicating penalty u/s 271B for failure to furnish audit report. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order, restoring matter to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication in interest of justice and fairness. Assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
CIT(A) directed to first adjudicate assessee's appeal against quantum assessment, determine business turnover, and whether assessee falls within Section 44AB for audit obligation before adjudicating penalty u/s 271B for failure to furnish audit report. ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order, restoring matter to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication in interest of justice and fairness. Assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.