Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
AT held that M/s North Star Homes continue to remain owner and in possession of impugned property. Neither property was transferred to alleged Benamidar nor held by them. No evidence that cash infusions into Benamidar's accounts were made by Beneficial Owner. Impugned Order set aside as neither property is Benami nor transaction regarding it is Benami.
AT held that M/s North Star Homes continue to remain owner and in possession of impugned property. Neither property was transferred to alleged Benamidar nor held by them. No evidence that cash infusions into Benamidar's accounts were made by Beneficial Owner. Impugned Order set aside as neither property is Benami nor transaction regarding it is Benami.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.