Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the word "and" in Custom Tariff Item 8517(iv) is to be read disjunctively. The exemption under amended Notification 24/2005-Cus applies to Wireless Access Points operating solely on MIMO technology. The respondent's imported WAPs employing MIMO but not LTE qualify for exemption from Basic Customs Duty. The phrase "MIMO and LTE Products" covers only products combining both technologies. The appeal by Revenue was dismissed.
The HC held that the word "and" in Custom Tariff Item 8517(iv) is to be read disjunctively. The exemption under amended Notification 24/2005-Cus applies to Wireless Access Points operating solely on MIMO technology. The respondent's imported WAPs employing MIMO but not LTE qualify for exemption from Basic Customs Duty. The phrase "MIMO and LTE Products" covers only products combining both technologies. The appeal by Revenue was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.