Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Appellant, a UK company, had a business connection and PE in India u/s 9(1). 15% of booking fees were attributable to the PE in India, following earlier decisions for AY 2018-19 and 2019-20. Observations regarding appellant's status as a conduit entity were unnecessary and irrelevant. ITAT allowed appellant's appeal.
Appellant, a UK company, had a business connection and PE in India u/s 9(1). 15% of booking fees were attributable to the PE in India, following earlier decisions for AY 2018-19 and 2019-20. Observations regarding appellant's status as a conduit entity were unnecessary and irrelevant. ITAT allowed appellant's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.