Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Appellant, a UK company, had a business connection and PE in India u/s 9(1). 15% of booking fees were attributable to the PE in India, following earlier decisions for AY 2018-19 and 2019-20. Observations regarding appellant's status as a conduit entity were unnecessary and irrelevant. ITAT allowed appellant's appeal.
Appellant, a UK company, had a business connection and PE in India u/s 9(1). 15% of booking fees were attributable to the PE in India, following earlier decisions for AY 2018-19 and 2019-20. Observations regarding appellant's status as a conduit entity were unnecessary and irrelevant. ITAT allowed appellant's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.