Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC held that the petition was not maintainable as the petitioner had an alternative efficacious remedy of appeal u/s 107 of the CGST Act, 2017. The absence of a corresponding state notification did not render the central N/N. 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28.12.2023, issued u/s 168-A of the CGST Act, ultra vires. The petitioner failed to raise any ground worth consideration, and the HC dismissed the petition, being devoid of merit, directing the petitioner to avail the appellate remedy.
The HC held that the petition was not maintainable as the petitioner had an alternative efficacious remedy of appeal u/s 107 of the CGST Act, 2017. The absence of a corresponding state notification did not render the central N/N. 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28.12.2023, issued u/s 168-A of the CGST Act, ultra vires. The petitioner failed to raise any ground worth consideration, and the HC dismissed the petition, being devoid of merit, directing the petitioner to avail the appellate remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.