Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The HC held that the petition was not maintainable as the petitioner had an alternative efficacious remedy of appeal u/s 107 of the CGST Act, 2017. The absence of a corresponding state notification did not render the central N/N. 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28.12.2023, issued u/s 168-A of the CGST Act, ultra vires. The petitioner failed to raise any ground worth consideration, and the HC dismissed the petition, being devoid of merit, directing the petitioner to avail the appellate remedy.
The HC held that the petition was not maintainable as the petitioner had an alternative efficacious remedy of appeal u/s 107 of the CGST Act, 2017. The absence of a corresponding state notification did not render the central N/N. 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28.12.2023, issued u/s 168-A of the CGST Act, ultra vires. The petitioner failed to raise any ground worth consideration, and the HC dismissed the petition, being devoid of merit, directing the petitioner to avail the appellate remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.