Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The HC held that the review application was partly allowed. There was no mistake apparent on record regarding the application of the Supreme Court decision and the definition of "local authority" under the GST Act. The Notified Area Authority, Vapi does not qualify as a "local authority" or "governmental authority" for GST exemption on pure services or supply of goods. Review jurisdiction cannot be exercised as an appellate jurisdiction to correct errors of law, as it would amount to the Court sitting in appeal over its own judgment.
The HC held that the review application was partly allowed. There was no mistake apparent on record regarding the application of the Supreme Court decision and the definition of "local authority" under the GST Act. The Notified Area Authority, Vapi does not qualify as a "local authority" or "governmental authority" for GST exemption on pure services or supply of goods. Review jurisdiction cannot be exercised as an appellate jurisdiction to correct errors of law, as it would amount to the Court sitting in appeal over its own judgment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.