Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, holding: i) No fault in the assignment by lenders to Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. ii) Proceedings not barred by res judicata. iii) Corporate debtors running profitable hotels, making payments to lenders. iv) Adjudicating authority erred in not considering Cash Management Agreement for finding default. v) Lenders obligated to maintain DSRA amount from loan agreement towards repayment. vi) Corporate debtor disputed default before adjudicating authority. vii) End use certificate not sufficient to reject corporate debtor's claims on use of ECLGS funds by lenders. viii) Adjudicating authority to reconsider default afresh under ECLGS-1, loan agreement after examining relevant materials like CMA, DSRA. ix) No finding of default under ECLGS-2 by adjudicating authority.
The NCLAT set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, holding: i) No fault in the assignment by lenders to Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. ii) Proceedings not barred by res judicata. iii) Corporate debtors running profitable hotels, making payments to lenders. iv) Adjudicating authority erred in not considering Cash Management Agreement for finding default. v) Lenders obligated to maintain DSRA amount from loan agreement towards repayment. vi) Corporate debtor disputed default before adjudicating authority. vii) End use certificate not sufficient to reject corporate debtor's claims on use of ECLGS funds by lenders. viii) Adjudicating authority to reconsider default afresh under ECLGS-1, loan agreement after examining relevant materials like CMA, DSRA. ix) No finding of default under ECLGS-2 by adjudicating authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.