Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, holding: i) No fault in the assignment by lenders to Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. ii) Proceedings not barred by res judicata. iii) Corporate debtors running profitable hotels, making payments to lenders. iv) Adjudicating authority erred in not considering Cash Management Agreement for finding default. v) Lenders obligated to maintain DSRA amount from loan agreement towards repayment. vi) Corporate debtor disputed default before adjudicating authority. vii) End use certificate not sufficient to reject corporate debtor's claims on use of ECLGS funds by lenders. viii) Adjudicating authority to reconsider default afresh under ECLGS-1, loan agreement after examining relevant materials like CMA, DSRA. ix) No finding of default under ECLGS-2 by adjudicating authority.
The NCLAT set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, holding: i) No fault in the assignment by lenders to Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. ii) Proceedings not barred by res judicata. iii) Corporate debtors running profitable hotels, making payments to lenders. iv) Adjudicating authority erred in not considering Cash Management Agreement for finding default. v) Lenders obligated to maintain DSRA amount from loan agreement towards repayment. vi) Corporate debtor disputed default before adjudicating authority. vii) End use certificate not sufficient to reject corporate debtor's claims on use of ECLGS funds by lenders. viii) Adjudicating authority to reconsider default afresh under ECLGS-1, loan agreement after examining relevant materials like CMA, DSRA. ix) No finding of default under ECLGS-2 by adjudicating authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.