Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC held that the supply of a Solar Power Generating System by the petitioner is a composite supply and does not amount to a works contract u/s 2(119) of the GST Act. The solar power plant is not immovable property as the solar modules are not attached to the civil foundation for permanent beneficial enjoyment. The civil foundation is embedded for beneficial enjoyment of the Solar Power Generating Station itself. The HC relied on the SC judgment in Duncans Industries Limited to distinguish immovable property. The transaction does not qualify as a works contract, and the petition was allowed.
The HC held that the supply of a Solar Power Generating System by the petitioner is a composite supply and does not amount to a works contract u/s 2(119) of the GST Act. The solar power plant is not immovable property as the solar modules are not attached to the civil foundation for permanent beneficial enjoyment. The civil foundation is embedded for beneficial enjoyment of the Solar Power Generating Station itself. The HC relied on the SC judgment in Duncans Industries Limited to distinguish immovable property. The transaction does not qualify as a works contract, and the petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.