Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The PCIT lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 revising the assessment order when the issue of unpaid TDS was already the subject matter of an appeal before the CIT(A). As per Explanation 1(c) to s.263, the PCIT is barred from initiating revision proceedings when an appeal is pending before the CIT(A). The CIT(A)'s powers are co-terminus with the AO's, allowing redressal. The decisions in Smt. Renuka Philip, Golden Vats Pvt. Ltd., and CIT vs. Shalimar Housing affirmed this statutory bar on the PCIT's revisionary jurisdiction when the matter is already under appeal before the CIT(A). The assessee's case was decided in their favor.
The PCIT lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 revising the assessment order when the issue of unpaid TDS was already the subject matter of an appeal before the CIT(A). As per Explanation 1(c) to s.263, the PCIT is barred from initiating revision proceedings when an appeal is pending before the CIT(A). The CIT(A)'s powers are co-terminus with the AO's, allowing redressal. The decisions in Smt. Renuka Philip, Golden Vats Pvt. Ltd., and CIT vs. Shalimar Housing affirmed this statutory bar on the PCIT's revisionary jurisdiction when the matter is already under appeal before the CIT(A). The assessee's case was decided in their favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.