Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The PCIT lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 revising the assessment order when the issue of unpaid TDS was already the subject matter of an appeal before the CIT(A). As per Explanation 1(c) to s.263, the PCIT is barred from initiating revision proceedings when an appeal is pending before the CIT(A). The CIT(A)'s powers are co-terminus with the AO's, allowing redressal. The decisions in Smt. Renuka Philip, Golden Vats Pvt. Ltd., and CIT vs. Shalimar Housing affirmed this statutory bar on the PCIT's revisionary jurisdiction when the matter is already under appeal before the CIT(A). The assessee's case was decided in their favor.
The PCIT lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 revising the assessment order when the issue of unpaid TDS was already the subject matter of an appeal before the CIT(A). As per Explanation 1(c) to s.263, the PCIT is barred from initiating revision proceedings when an appeal is pending before the CIT(A). The CIT(A)'s powers are co-terminus with the AO's, allowing redressal. The decisions in Smt. Renuka Philip, Golden Vats Pvt. Ltd., and CIT vs. Shalimar Housing affirmed this statutory bar on the PCIT's revisionary jurisdiction when the matter is already under appeal before the CIT(A). The assessee's case was decided in their favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
