Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner challenging the rejection of its One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal and seeking relief after commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of its step-down subsidiary/Borrower Entity. The HC held that the petitioner failed to approach the court immediately after the OTS rejection, and the delay clouded its bona fides. The RBI Framework must give way to the CIRP once initiated, as the IBC is a self-contained Code. The HC ruled that it cannot compel the sole Financial Creditor to accept an OTS proposal once the CIRP commences, as it replaces bipartite negotiations with multi-party resolutions involving the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy under the IBC but failed to avail it. The withdrawal from CIRP after the CoC's approval of the Resolution Plan would unsettle the binding settlement with the Successful Resolution Applicant. The power to withdraw u/s 12A is subject to the CoC's approval.
The HC dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner challenging the rejection of its One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal and seeking relief after commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of its step-down subsidiary/Borrower Entity. The HC held that the petitioner failed to approach the court immediately after the OTS rejection, and the delay clouded its bona fides. The RBI Framework must give way to the CIRP once initiated, as the IBC is a self-contained Code. The HC ruled that it cannot compel the sole Financial Creditor to accept an OTS proposal once the CIRP commences, as it replaces bipartite negotiations with multi-party resolutions involving the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy under the IBC but failed to avail it. The withdrawal from CIRP after the CoC's approval of the Resolution Plan would unsettle the binding settlement with the Successful Resolution Applicant. The power to withdraw u/s 12A is subject to the CoC's approval.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
