Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The appellants, as individual co-owners of a jointly owned immovable property, are eligible for service tax exemption individually on rent received from leasing the property. They are entitled to separate threshold exemptions under Notification No. 6/2005-S.T. dated 1-3-2005 and cannot be considered an association of persons for combined service tax recovery. The CESTAT held that co-owners receiving rent individually are eligible for separate threshold exemptions. The appeal was allowed.
The appellants, as individual co-owners of a jointly owned immovable property, are eligible for service tax exemption individually on rent received from leasing the property. They are entitled to separate threshold exemptions under Notification No. 6/2005-S.T. dated 1-3-2005 and cannot be considered an association of persons for combined service tax recovery. The CESTAT held that co-owners receiving rent individually are eligible for separate threshold exemptions. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
