Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of ESOP expenditure, directing the AO to follow the binding precedents of the Karnataka HC and ITAT Special Bench on this issue. It held that the AO violated judicial discipline by rejecting the claim without considering these higher judicial precedents, disrespecting principles of judicial precedents. The ITAT reprimanded the lower authorities for grossly rejecting the assessee's claim to keep the issue alive despite the coordinate Bench remanding it for fresh examination, when the ESOP matter was pending before the Supreme Court.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of ESOP expenditure, directing the AO to follow the binding precedents of the Karnataka HC and ITAT Special Bench on this issue. It held that the AO violated judicial discipline by rejecting the claim without considering these higher judicial precedents, disrespecting principles of judicial precedents. The ITAT reprimanded the lower authorities for grossly rejecting the assessee's claim to keep the issue alive despite the coordinate Bench remanding it for fresh examination, when the ESOP matter was pending before the Supreme Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.