Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The ITAT held that interest received on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of land u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is taxable as 'Income from Other Sources' u/s 56(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act. This is in line with the Delhi HC's decision in PCIT vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi HUF, distinguishing the Supreme Court's ruling in CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF which treated such interest as capital gains. The assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(37) was rejected.
The ITAT held that interest received on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of land u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is taxable as 'Income from Other Sources' u/s 56(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act. This is in line with the Delhi HC's decision in PCIT vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi HUF, distinguishing the Supreme Court's ruling in CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF which treated such interest as capital gains. The assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(37) was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.