Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The CESTAT held that the transactions do not constitute "Supply of Tangible Goods Service" u/s 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Appellant had possession, control, and right to use the packaging material once delivered by Volvo. Volvo's access to information did not confer control or possession over the material. The Appellant could use the material as deemed fit, was liable for damages, and had more than mere custody. The CESTAT relied on the coordinate bench decision in CARAVEL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. case applying the Supreme Court's five-fold test in BSNL case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT held that the transactions do not constitute "Supply of Tangible Goods Service" u/s 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Appellant had possession, control, and right to use the packaging material once delivered by Volvo. Volvo's access to information did not confer control or possession over the material. The Appellant could use the material as deemed fit, was liable for damages, and had more than mere custody. The CESTAT relied on the coordinate bench decision in CARAVEL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. case applying the Supreme Court's five-fold test in BSNL case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
