Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The CESTAT held that the transactions do not constitute "Supply of Tangible Goods Service" u/s 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Appellant had possession, control, and right to use the packaging material once delivered by Volvo. Volvo's access to information did not confer control or possession over the material. The Appellant could use the material as deemed fit, was liable for damages, and had more than mere custody. The CESTAT relied on the coordinate bench decision in CARAVEL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. case applying the Supreme Court's five-fold test in BSNL case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT held that the transactions do not constitute "Supply of Tangible Goods Service" u/s 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Appellant had possession, control, and right to use the packaging material once delivered by Volvo. Volvo's access to information did not confer control or possession over the material. The Appellant could use the material as deemed fit, was liable for damages, and had more than mere custody. The CESTAT relied on the coordinate bench decision in CARAVEL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. case applying the Supreme Court's five-fold test in BSNL case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
