Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
The HC granted time to the respondents to file a reply challenging the circular dated 27.10.2023 and the petitioner's contention that providing a corporate guarantee by a holding company to its subsidiary does not constitute a "supply" or "supply of service" taxable u/s 9 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC stayed the operation of the impugned circular dated 27.10.2023 regarding Item No. 2 until further orders.
The HC granted time to the respondents to file a reply challenging the circular dated 27.10.2023 and the petitioner's contention that providing a corporate guarantee by a holding company to its subsidiary does not constitute a "supply" or "supply of service" taxable u/s 9 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC stayed the operation of the impugned circular dated 27.10.2023 regarding Item No. 2 until further orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.