Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The HC granted time to the respondents to file a reply challenging the circular dated 27.10.2023 and the petitioner's contention that providing a corporate guarantee by a holding company to its subsidiary does not constitute a "supply" or "supply of service" taxable u/s 9 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC stayed the operation of the impugned circular dated 27.10.2023 regarding Item No. 2 until further orders.
The HC granted time to the respondents to file a reply challenging the circular dated 27.10.2023 and the petitioner's contention that providing a corporate guarantee by a holding company to its subsidiary does not constitute a "supply" or "supply of service" taxable u/s 9 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC stayed the operation of the impugned circular dated 27.10.2023 regarding Item No. 2 until further orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.