Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
The HC granted time to the respondents to file a reply challenging the circular dated 27.10.2023 and the petitioner's contention that providing a corporate guarantee by a holding company to its subsidiary does not constitute a "supply" or "supply of service" taxable u/s 9 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC stayed the operation of the impugned circular dated 27.10.2023 regarding Item No. 2 until further orders.
The HC granted time to the respondents to file a reply challenging the circular dated 27.10.2023 and the petitioner's contention that providing a corporate guarantee by a holding company to its subsidiary does not constitute a "supply" or "supply of service" taxable u/s 9 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC stayed the operation of the impugned circular dated 27.10.2023 regarding Item No. 2 until further orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.