Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
The HC granted time to the respondents to file a reply challenging the circular dated 27.10.2023 and the petitioner's contention that providing a corporate guarantee by a holding company to its subsidiary does not constitute a "supply" or "supply of service" taxable u/s 9 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC stayed the operation of the impugned circular dated 27.10.2023 regarding Item No. 2 until further orders.
The HC granted time to the respondents to file a reply challenging the circular dated 27.10.2023 and the petitioner's contention that providing a corporate guarantee by a holding company to its subsidiary does not constitute a "supply" or "supply of service" taxable u/s 9 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC stayed the operation of the impugned circular dated 27.10.2023 regarding Item No. 2 until further orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.