Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The GAAR held that specially designed transformers for WOEG performing dual step-down and step-up functions, supplied by the appellant along with WOEG, cannot be treated as part of WOEG. This is based on CBIC's circular excluding transformers from WOEG parts as per Ministry of New and Renewable Energy's clarification. The appellant's reliance on popular meaning/common parlance principle and Enercon India Ltd's case was rejected as legally untenable. Consequently, such transformers are ineligible for exemption under Sr. No. 234 and 201A of Notification No. 1/2017-CT (Rate). The appeal was dismissed.
The GAAR held that specially designed transformers for WOEG performing dual step-down and step-up functions, supplied by the appellant along with WOEG, cannot be treated as part of WOEG. This is based on CBIC's circular excluding transformers from WOEG parts as per Ministry of New and Renewable Energy's clarification. The appellant's reliance on popular meaning/common parlance principle and Enercon India Ltd's case was rejected as legally untenable. Consequently, such transformers are ineligible for exemption under Sr. No. 234 and 201A of Notification No. 1/2017-CT (Rate). The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.