Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The CESTAT held that the appellant bank merely acted on behalf of the Indian exporter and facilitated the service. The appellant bank would not be liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism on 'foreign bank charges' paid to the foreign correspondent bank. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed.
The CESTAT held that the appellant bank merely acted on behalf of the Indian exporter and facilitated the service. The appellant bank would not be liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism on 'foreign bank charges' paid to the foreign correspondent bank. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
