Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The HC affirmed the applicability of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for recovery of excess duty collected. The petitioner had filed Form SVLDRS-1, admitting tax liability, thereby attracting Section 11D(1). The challenge to the show cause notice's jurisdiction was rejected. The petitioner is liable to pay the self-assessed duty, having paid a partial amount. The petitioner is entitled to set off the tax liability through CENVAT credit u/r 3(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, subject to establishing input tax payment. The HC directed revisiting the penalty imposition. The benefit of CENVAT credit cannot be denied. The petition was disposed of.
The HC affirmed the applicability of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for recovery of excess duty collected. The petitioner had filed Form SVLDRS-1, admitting tax liability, thereby attracting Section 11D(1). The challenge to the show cause notice's jurisdiction was rejected. The petitioner is liable to pay the self-assessed duty, having paid a partial amount. The petitioner is entitled to set off the tax liability through CENVAT credit u/r 3(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, subject to establishing input tax payment. The HC directed revisiting the penalty imposition. The benefit of CENVAT credit cannot be denied. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
