Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC affirmed the applicability of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for recovery of excess duty collected. The petitioner had filed Form SVLDRS-1, admitting tax liability, thereby attracting Section 11D(1). The challenge to the show cause notice's jurisdiction was rejected. The petitioner is liable to pay the self-assessed duty, having paid a partial amount. The petitioner is entitled to set off the tax liability through CENVAT credit u/r 3(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, subject to establishing input tax payment. The HC directed revisiting the penalty imposition. The benefit of CENVAT credit cannot be denied. The petition was disposed of.
The HC affirmed the applicability of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for recovery of excess duty collected. The petitioner had filed Form SVLDRS-1, admitting tax liability, thereby attracting Section 11D(1). The challenge to the show cause notice's jurisdiction was rejected. The petitioner is liable to pay the self-assessed duty, having paid a partial amount. The petitioner is entitled to set off the tax liability through CENVAT credit u/r 3(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, subject to establishing input tax payment. The HC directed revisiting the penalty imposition. The benefit of CENVAT credit cannot be denied. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
