Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
AO proceeded with best judgment assessment u/s 144 making addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash deposit. CIT(A) upheld penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1), 143(2). ITAT held non-compliance wasn't willful, but due to negligence of authorized representative beyond assessee's control. Show-cause notice by AO u/s 274 r.w.s. 272A(1)(d) lacked specificity, erroneously invoking inapplicable provision. Assessee demonstrated reasonable cause u/s 273B through affidavits explaining default wasn't mala fide. Initial compliance showed intention to cooperate. Penalty unsustainable. Decided in assessee's favor.
AO proceeded with best judgment assessment u/s 144 making addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash deposit. CIT(A) upheld penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1), 143(2). ITAT held non-compliance wasn't willful, but due to negligence of authorized representative beyond assessee's control. Show-cause notice by AO u/s 274 r.w.s. 272A(1)(d) lacked specificity, erroneously invoking inapplicable provision. Assessee demonstrated reasonable cause u/s 273B through affidavits explaining default wasn't mala fide. Initial compliance showed intention to cooperate. Penalty unsustainable. Decided in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
