TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The appellant is eligible for interest on delayed refund from 22.02.2008 till the refund payment date, calculated at 12% per annum rate. CESTAT allowed the appeal, directing interest payment within 8 weeks from order communication. The relevant date for interest computation is 3 months from refund claim filing, not refund order date as per SC precedent in Ranbaxy case. Interest rate of 12% is based on Allahabad CESTAT's Parle Agro judgment interpreting Section 11BB.
The appellant is eligible for interest on delayed refund from 22.02.2008 till the refund payment date, calculated at 12% per annum rate. CESTAT allowed the appeal, directing interest payment within 8 weeks from order communication. The relevant date for interest computation is 3 months from refund claim filing, not refund order date as per SC precedent in Ranbaxy case. Interest rate of 12% is based on Allahabad CESTAT's Parle Agro judgment interpreting Section 11BB.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
